Side-by-side · Rubric js-v1.0
AIApply vs LoopCV
AIApply
AIApply is an AI job-search suite for job seekers that auto-applies to matched jobs on their behalf and generates tailored resumes and cover letters plus real-time interview coaching.
Substantial gaps
Auto-apply
LoopCV
LoopCV is a job-search automation platform that continuously matches a job seeker's CV to postings across 30+ job boards and applies on their behalf via ATS form-fills, LinkedIn Easy Apply, and templated emails to recruiters.
Substantial gaps
Auto-apply
The result
LoopCV leads AIApply by 7 points.
Inside the Auto-apply cohort, rubric js-v1.0 puts LoopCV on 50 and AIApply on 43, 7 points apart. AIApply takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Data & Credential Safety among them, against 5 for LoopCV, whose share includes Pricing & Cancellation Fairness, and 1 is level. Even Pricing & Cancellation Fairness, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (AIApply 27, LoopCV 65, 10% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage LoopCV builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- AIApply1
- LoopCV5
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Pricing & Cancellation Fairness27 vs 65
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Pricing & Cancellation Fairness10% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
AIApply and LoopCV are both filed under Auto-apply tools. They also share 1 secondary category: Resume AI.
| Record | AIApply | LoopCV |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | GR |
| Founded | 2023 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
10% weight29% of the movement so far
AIApply27LoopCV653.8 weighted points to LoopCV
- 2
Data & Credential Safety
20% weight52% of the movement so far
AIApply55LoopCV403.0 weighted points to AIApply
- 3
Application Honesty
20% weight72% of the movement so far
AIApply42LoopCV552.6 weighted points to LoopCV
- 4
Support & Accountability
8% weight87% of the movement so far
AIApply44LoopCV681.9 weighted points to LoopCV
- 5
User Control & Transparency
15% weight98% of the movement so far
AIApply50LoopCV601.5 weighted points to LoopCV
- 6
Effectiveness Evidence
12% weight100% of the movement so far
AIApply33LoopCV350.2 weighted points to LoopCV
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -7.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AIApply minus LoopCV, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | AIApply | LoopCV | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -2.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +3.0 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 27 | 65 | -38 | -3.8 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 44 | 68 | -24 | -1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 43F | 50F | -7 | -7.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AIApply | LoopCV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AIApply has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; LoopCV has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LoopCV sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for AIApply, across 6 distinct source domains, and 14 for LoopCV, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- AIApply last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LoopCV last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against