§ The result
Beamery leads Alooba on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Beamery finishes 23 points clear of Alooba under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 38 (F) — across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Beamery leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Alooba is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Beamery leads is FRIA Support, Alooba 28 to Beamery 30. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Alooba 22, Beamery 85) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 49% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Alooba
Alooba sells online skills assessments (auto-graded SQL, Python/R, multiple-choice and data-analysis tests, plus manually graded free-response and one-way video questions) that employers use to screen, benchmark and optionally auto-reject job candidates.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
§ The record
Alooba is filed under Assessment AI, Beamery under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Alooba is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Alooba | Beamery |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | GB |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Alooba 22 · Beamery 85
11.3 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Alooba 40 · Beamery 70
6.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Alooba 36 · Beamery 60
2.9 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Alooba 45 · Beamery 60
2.3 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Alooba 28 · Beamery 30
0.3 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Alooba 58 · Beamery 60
0.2 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -22.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Alooba minus Beamery.
| Category | Weight | Alooba | Beamery | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 70 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 85 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 60 | -24 | -2.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 61 (D) | -23 | -22.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Alooba | Beamery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Alooba has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Alooba and Beamery sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Alooba, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Alooba last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next