Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Alooba vs Toggl Hire
Alooba
Alooba sells online skills assessments (auto-graded SQL, Python/R, multiple-choice and data-analysis tests, plus manually graded free-response and one-way video questions) that employers use to screen, benchmark and optionally auto-reject job candidates.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Alooba and Toggl Hire.
Within the Assessment cohort, Alooba edges Toggl Hire by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 38 to 37. Alooba leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Toggl Hire leads 2, including Data Governance Disclosure. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Alooba 40, Toggl Hire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage Alooba holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Alooba5
- Toggl Hire2
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation40 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Alooba and Toggl Hire are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Alooba | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | AU | EE |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight38% of the movement so far
Alooba40Toggl Hire302.0 weighted points to Alooba
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight66% of the movement so far
Alooba45Toggl Hire551.5 weighted points to Toggl Hire
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight78% of the movement so far
Alooba58Toggl Hire500.6 weighted points to Alooba
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight85% of the movement so far
Alooba22Toggl Hire200.4 weighted points to Alooba
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Alooba55Toggl Hire520.4 weighted points to Alooba
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Alooba28Toggl Hire300.3 weighted points to Toggl Hire
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Alooba36Toggl Hire350.1 weighted points to Alooba
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Alooba minus Toggl Hire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Alooba | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 35 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 38F | 37F | +1 | +1.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Alooba | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Alooba has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Alooba sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Alooba, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Alooba last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against