§ The result
Coderbyte leads AmazingHiring by 5 points.
Coderbyte scores 42 and AmazingHiring 37 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Coderbyte: Coderbyte is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and AmazingHiring on Bias Audit Transparency. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap (AmazingHiring 48, Coderbyte 60) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (AmazingHiring 35, Coderbyte 44), 30% of the weighted advantage Coderbyte builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Coderbyte under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Coderbyte is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Coderbyte |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Coderbyte 44
1.8 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Coderbyte 60
1.4 weighted points to Coderbyte
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Coderbyte 56
0.9 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Coderbyte 40
0.8 weighted points to Coderbyte
8% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Coderbyte 58
0.5 weighted points to Coderbyte
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Coderbyte 33
0.4 weighted points to Coderbyte
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Coderbyte 20
0.4 weighted points to AmazingHiring
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Coderbyte.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Coderbyte | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 44 | -9 | -1.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 56 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 42 (F) | -5 | -5.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Coderbyte | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next