§ The result
AmazingHiring and myInterview tie at 37.
AmazingHiring (Sourcing) and myInterview (Video interview) tie at 37 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. AmazingHiring leads 3 of the 7 criteria and myInterview 2, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — AmazingHiring 22, myInterview 35 — and at an 18% weight it carries 80% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only myInterview is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | AmazingHiring | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · myInterview 35
2.3 weighted points to myInterview
15% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · myInterview 42
1.2 weighted points to AmazingHiring
8% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · myInterview 40
1.0 weighted points to AmazingHiring
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · myInterview 25
0.8 weighted points to AmazingHiring
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · myInterview 38
0.6 weighted points to myInterview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to 0.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that 0.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 42 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 48 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 33 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 37 (F) | - | 0.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next