§ The result
Aon Assessment takes the total, HireQuotient takes more of the criteria.
Aon Assessment holds a 1-point edge over HireQuotient under rubric v1.0, 35 to 34, across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. HireQuotient leads more of the criteria, 4 against 3 for Aon Assessment, yet Aon Assessment takes Bias Audit Transparency, which carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Aon Assessment 30, HireQuotient 18 — and at an 18% weight it carries 60% of the weighted advantage Aon Assessment holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Video interview and Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | DE | SG |
| Founded | 2002 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · HireQuotient 18
2.2 weighted points to Aon Assessment
12% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · HireQuotient 57
1.4 weighted points to HireQuotient
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · HireQuotient 35
1.0 weighted points to Aon Assessment
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · HireQuotient 30
0.6 weighted points to HireQuotient
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · HireQuotient 22
0.4 weighted points to Aon Assessment
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · HireQuotient 40
0.3 weighted points to HireQuotient
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · HireQuotient 50
0.2 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus HireQuotient.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 18 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 57 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 34 (F) | +1 | +1.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next