Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Aon Assessment vs Pulsifi
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
2 points separate Aon Assessment and Pulsifi.
Under rubric v1.0, Aon Assessment and Pulsifi finish 2 points apart, 35 to 33, as two Assessment entries. Aon Assessment and Pulsifi each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Aon Assessment holds (headed by Article 11 Technical Documentation) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Aon Assessment 40, Pulsifi 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 51% of the weighted advantage Aon Assessment holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Aon Assessment3
- Pulsifi3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation40 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Aon Assessment and Pulsifi are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Video interview and Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Aon Assessment | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | SG |
| Founded | 2002 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight34% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment40Pulsifi302.0 weighted points to Aon Assessment
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight65% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment30Pulsifi201.8 weighted points to Aon Assessment
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment45Pulsifi551.2 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment25Pulsifi280.4 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment38Pulsifi400.3 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment48Pulsifi460.2 weighted points to Aon Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +2.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Pulsifi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 20 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 46 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 35F | 33F | +2 | +2.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.