Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Apriora (Alex) vs Pinpoint
Apriora (Alex)
Apriora's product "Alex" is an agentic AI recruiter whose live voice/video interviewer conducts real-time conversational interviews with candidates, asks dynamic follow-ups, and returns role-fit scores, transcripts, and fraud flags to the hiring team.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Apriora (Alex) and Pinpoint tie at 57.
Apriora (Alex) (Video interview) and Pinpoint (Screening) tie at 57 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Apriora (Alex) leads 1 of the 7 criteria and Pinpoint 5, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Apriora (Alex) 83, Pinpoint 42) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 100% of the weighted advantage Apriora (Alex) holds across the 1 criterion it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Apriora (Alex)1
- Pinpoint5
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency83 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Apriora (Alex) is filed under Video interview AI, Pinpoint under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Apriora (Alex) is in scope of
| Record | Apriora (Alex) | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2023 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight50% of the movement so far
Apriora (Alex)83Pinpoint427.4 weighted points to Apriora (Alex)
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight76% of the movement so far
Apriora (Alex)52Pinpoint724.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight91% of the movement so far
Apriora (Alex)54Pinpoint682.1 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight95% of the movement so far
Apriora (Alex)47Pinpoint520.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Apriora (Alex)60Pinpoint640.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Apriora (Alex)62Pinpoint660.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Apriora (Alex) minus Pinpoint, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Apriora (Alex) | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 72 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 42 | +41 | +7.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 68 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 52 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 57F | 57F | - | -0.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Apriora (Alex) | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Apriora (Alex) has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Apriora (Alex) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Apriora (Alex), across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Apriora (Alex) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.