Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs Pinpoint
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows — candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | Pinpoint | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 72 | -22 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 42 | -7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 68 | -11 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 64 | -8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 52 | -22 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 66 | -2 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 57 (F) | -11 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Pinpoint
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- public statement
- 5
- absence
- 2