Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arena Analytics vs Entelo
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Substantial gaps
Screening
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
1 point separates Entelo and Arena Analytics.
Entelo (Sourcing) edges Arena Analytics (Screening) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 33 to 32. The 7 criteria split 4 to 1 in favour of Entelo, with 2 level: Entelo is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and Arena Analytics on Bias Audit Transparency. Arena Analytics takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Arena Analytics 25, Entelo 20), 100% of the weighted advantage it builds, while the widest raw gap is on Post-Market Monitoring, Arena Analytics 28 to Entelo 35.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Arena Analytics1
- Entelo4
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring28 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, Entelo under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Arena Analytics is in scope of
| Record | Arena Analytics | Entelo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2011 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight32% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics25Entelo200.9 weighted points to Arena Analytics
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight61% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics28Entelo350.8 weighted points to Entelo
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight78% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics38Entelo420.5 weighted points to Entelo
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight94% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics42Entelo450.4 weighted points to Entelo
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Arena Analytics38Entelo400.2 weighted points to Entelo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus Entelo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | Entelo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 20 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 32F | 33F | -1 | -1.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | Entelo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.