§ The result
Clevry leads Arya by Leoforce by 7 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Clevry, filed under Assessment, finishes on 45 and Arya by Leoforce, filed under Sourcing, on 38, 7 points apart. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Clevry, with 1 level: Clevry is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Arya by Leoforce on Bias Audit Transparency. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Arya by Leoforce 30, Clevry 52 — and at a 20% weight it carries 56% of the weighted advantage Clevry holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
Clevry
Clevry is a UK psychometric assessment platform offering norm-referenced personality questionnaires, cognitive ability tests and situational judgement tests, plus recorded one-way video interviews, an interview builder, a skills-first ATS and an AI tool that maps job ads onto its personality scale library.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Clevry under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Clevry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | Clevry |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 1991 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · Clevry 52
4.4 weighted points to Clevry
8% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · Clevry 60
1.1 weighted points to Clevry
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · Clevry 55
1.1 weighted points to Clevry
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arya by Leoforce 25 · Clevry 30
0.8 weighted points to Clevry
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · Clevry 58
0.5 weighted points to Clevry
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · Clevry 38
0.4 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -7.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus Clevry.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Clevry | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 60 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 45 (F) | -7 | -7.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Clevry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 39 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 75 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Clevry last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next