§ The result
3 points separate eSkill and Arya by Leoforce.
eSkill (Assessment) edges Arya by Leoforce (Sourcing) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 38. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of eSkill: eSkill is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Arya by Leoforce on Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Arya by Leoforce 30, eSkill 48) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage eSkill holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
eSkill
eSkill is a pre-employment testing platform with auto-scored skills, cognitive and behavioral tests and human-rated one-way video interviews, plus an optional Proctorio-powered AI proctoring add-on that gives each candidate a suspicion score and a Claude-based "Linea" layer that drafts assessments from job descriptions.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, eSkill under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only eSkill is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | eSkill |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · eSkill 48
3.6 weighted points to eSkill
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · eSkill 25
2.7 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
8% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · eSkill 56
0.8 weighted points to eSkill
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arya by Leoforce 25 · eSkill 30
0.8 weighted points to eSkill
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · eSkill 36
0.7 weighted points to eSkill
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · eSkill 57
0.4 weighted points to eSkill
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · eSkill 47
0.1 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus eSkill.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | eSkill | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 48 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 25 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 47 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 57 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 56 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 41 (F) | -3 | -3.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | eSkill | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; eSkill has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for eSkill sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for eSkill, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- eSkill last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next