Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arya by Leoforce vs Fetcher
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Fetcher
AI-powered candidate sourcing and outbound recruiting platform that automates passive and active talent sourcing, personalized email outreach, and inbound applicant screening for corporate recruiting teams.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
1 point separates Arya by Leoforce and Fetcher.
Under rubric v1.0, Arya by Leoforce and Fetcher finish 1 point apart, 38 to 37, as two Sourcing entries. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to Arya by Leoforce and Fetcher, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side Arya by Leoforce holds, headed by Bias Audit Transparency, settle the total. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Arya by Leoforce 40, Fetcher 28 — and at an 18% weight it carries 72% of the weighted advantage Arya by Leoforce holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Arya by Leoforce3
- Fetcher3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency40 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Arya by Leoforce and Fetcher are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | Fetcher |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight40% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce40Fetcher282.2 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight60% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce48Fetcher551.1 weighted points to Fetcher
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight73% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce46Fetcher550.7 weighted points to Fetcher
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight84% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce30Fetcher270.6 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce30Fetcher350.6 weighted points to Fetcher
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce54Fetcher520.2 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus Fetcher, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Fetcher | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 27 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 52 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 55 | -9 | -0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 38F | 37F | +1 | +0.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Fetcher | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Fetcher has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Fetcher, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Fetcher last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.