Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arya by Leoforce vs Loxo
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Loxo
Loxo is an AI-native talent-intelligence platform that combines candidate sourcing, a recruiting CRM, and an applicant tracking system, using proprietary ranking models and a self-built talent graph of 800M+ people to source, rank, and match candidates for recruiting and staffing firms.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Arya by Leoforce takes the total, Loxo takes more of the criteria.
Arya by Leoforce holds a 1-point edge over Loxo under rubric v1.0, 38 to 37, with both scored in the Sourcing cohort. Loxo leads more of the criteria than Arya by Leoforce — 4 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Arya by Leoforce leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Arya by Leoforce. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Arya by Leoforce 40, Loxo 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 88% of the weighted advantage Arya by Leoforce holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Arya by Leoforce2
- Loxo4
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency40 vs 20
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Arya by Leoforce and Loxo are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Arya by Leoforce is in scope of
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight49% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce40Loxo203.6 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight66% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce30Loxo401.2 weighted points to Loxo
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight79% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce46Loxo581.0 weighted points to Loxo
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight89% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce25Loxo300.8 weighted points to Loxo
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce54Loxo500.5 weighted points to Arya by Leoforce
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Arya by Leoforce48Loxo500.3 weighted points to Loxo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus Loxo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Loxo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 20 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 50 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 58 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 38F | 37F | +1 | +0.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Loxo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Loxo last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.