§ The result
Tezi leads Arya by Leoforce on all 7 criteria.
Tezi finishes 20 points clear of Arya by Leoforce under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 38 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Tezi leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Arya by Leoforce leads none. The advantage Tezi holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Arya by Leoforce 40, Tezi 83, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 39% of the weighted points Tezi gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · Tezi 83
7.7 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · Tezi 52
4.4 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · Tezi 58
3.4 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arya by Leoforce 25 · Tezi 38
1.9 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · Tezi 63
1.1 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · Tezi 55
1.1 weighted points to Tezi
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · Tezi 50
0.3 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -19.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 83 | -43 | -7.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 63 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 58 | -28 | -3.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 50 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 58 (F) | -20 | -19.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next