§ The result
X0PA AI leads Arya by Leoforce on all 7 criteria.
X0PA AI, filed under Assessment, comes out 10 points above Arya by Leoforce, filed under Sourcing: 48 against 38 under rubric v1.0. X0PA AI leads every one of the 7 criteria, Arya by Leoforce none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Arya by Leoforce 54 to X0PA AI 57. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Arya by Leoforce 30, X0PA AI 50, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage X0PA AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Arya by Leoforce
Leoforce's AI agents, successors to its long-running Arya matching platform, source candidates from a proprietary talent database, job boards and customers' ATS records, score and rank them for fit, engage them by email and SMS, prescreen career-site visitors and deliver pre-vetted, interview-ready applicants.
Vendor profile
X0PA AI
X0PA AI is a Singapore-based B2B AI recruitment platform (applicant tracking system) that sources, screens, scores, and ranks candidates using proprietary predictive-scoring models (BRIQ Score and Suitability Score) plus the X0PA ROOM video-interview/assessment product, marketed around bias-reduced, "responsible and explainable" AI hiring.
§ The record
Arya by Leoforce is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, X0PA AI under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only X0PA AI is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arya by Leoforce | X0PA AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | High |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 30 · X0PA AI 50
4.0 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 56% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arya by Leoforce 25 · X0PA AI 38
1.9 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arya by Leoforce 48 · X0PA AI 56
1.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arya by Leoforce 30 · X0PA AI 40
1.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arya by Leoforce 46 · X0PA AI 60
1.1 weighted points to X0PA AI
18% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arya by Leoforce 40 · X0PA AI 44
0.7 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arya by Leoforce 54 · X0PA AI 57
0.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arya by Leoforce minus X0PA AI.
| Category | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | X0PA AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 44 | -4 | -0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 56 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 57 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 60 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 48 (F) | -10 | -10.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arya by Leoforce | X0PA AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arya by Leoforce has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; X0PA AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for X0PA AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Arya by Leoforce, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for X0PA AI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arya by Leoforce last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- X0PA AI last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next