§ The result
Beamery leads Cappfinity on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Beamery (Sourcing) opens a 21-point lead on Cappfinity (Assessment), 61 (D) to 40 (F). Cappfinity leads none of the 7 criteria, and Beamery is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, Cappfinity 28 — and at an 18% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Cappfinity under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Cappfinity is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Beamery | Cappfinity |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | GB |
| Founded | 2013 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Cappfinity 28
10.3 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Cappfinity 36
6.8 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Cappfinity 38
2.6 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Cappfinity 52
1.2 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Cappfinity 52
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Cappfinity 56
0.3 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Cappfinity 28
0.3 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +21.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +21 beside that +21.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Cappfinity.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Cappfinity | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 36 | +34 | +6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 28 | +57 | +10.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 56 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 40 (F) | +21 | +21.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Cappfinity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next