§ The result
Beamery leads Knockri by 14 points.
Beamery, filed under Sourcing, comes out 14 points above Knockri, filed under Video interview: 61 (D) against 47 (F) under rubric v1.0. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Beamery: Beamery is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Knockri on FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Beamery 85, Knockri 35 — and at an 18% weight it carries 56% of the weighted advantage Beamery holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Beamery
Talent CRM and sourcing platform that maintains a long-lived candidate pipeline, with AI-driven matching and skills inference.
Vendor profile
Knockri
Knockri runs asynchronous structured behavioural interviews that candidates answer by audio, video or text; it transcribes the answers, uses NLP models to score the work-related behaviours they describe against a skills framework, and produces per-skill scores and ranked shortlists.
§ The record
Beamery is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Knockri under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Knockri is in scope of Mobley v. Workday and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Beamery | Knockri |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | CA |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Beamery 85 · Knockri 35
9.0 weighted points to Beamery
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Beamery 70 · Knockri 55
3.0 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Beamery 60 · Knockri 35
3.0 weighted points to Beamery
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Beamery 30 · Knockri 35
0.8 weighted points to Knockri
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Beamery 60 · Knockri 55
0.8 weighted points to Beamery
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Beamery 55 · Knockri 60
0.6 weighted points to Knockri
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Beamery 60 · Knockri 55
0.4 weighted points to Beamery
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +14.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +14.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Beamery minus Knockri.
| Category | Weight | Beamery | Knockri | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 55 | +15 | +3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 35 | +50 | +9.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 47 (F) | +14 | +14.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Beamery | Knockri | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | — | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Beamery has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Knockri has 41 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Beamery and Knockri sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Beamery, across 2 distinct source domains, and 41 for Knockri, across 7 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Beamery last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Knockri last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next