Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Bryq vs Pinpoint
Bryq
Bryq is a science-based talent-intelligence platform whose core product is a short, blind, chatbot-driven pre-hire assessment scoring candidates on cognitive ability, personality/behavioral traits, and job skills to produce a job-fit "match" score used for hiring and internal mobility.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Bryq and Pinpoint tie at 57.
Bryq (Assessment) and Pinpoint (Screening) tie at 57 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Bryq leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Pinpoint 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Bryq 70, Pinpoint 42) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 88% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Bryq3
- Pinpoint3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency70 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Pinpoint under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Bryq is in scope of
| Record | Bryq | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight44% of the movement so far
Bryq70Pinpoint425.0 weighted points to Bryq
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight76% of the movement so far
Bryq54Pinpoint723.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Bryq54Pinpoint641.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight94% of the movement so far
Bryq62Pinpoint680.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight97% of the movement so far
Bryq55Pinpoint520.4 weighted points to Bryq
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Bryq40Pinpoint380.3 weighted points to Bryq
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to 0.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that 0.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Bryq minus Pinpoint, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Bryq | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 54 | 72 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 70 | 42 | +28 | +5.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 68 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 66 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 57F | 57F | - | 0.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Bryq | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Bryq last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.