§ The result
Eightfold AI leads Canditech on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Eightfold AI (Sourcing) and Canditech (Assessment): 64 (D) for Eightfold AI, 39 (F) for Canditech. Eightfold AI leads every one of the 7 criteria, Canditech none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, Canditech 58 to Eightfold AI 60. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Canditech 25, Eightfold AI 85 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Canditech
Canditech is a skills-assessment and job-simulation platform that screens candidates with work-sample tests, technical and soft-skill assessments, and one-way video interviews, using AI agents to auto-score open-text and video responses.
Vendor profile
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
§ The record
Canditech is filed under Assessment AI, Eightfold AI under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Canditech is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Canditech | Eightfold AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IL | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Canditech 25 · Eightfold AI 85
10.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Canditech 37 · Eightfold AI 75
7.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Canditech 30 · Eightfold AI 45
2.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Canditech 32 · Eightfold AI 50
2.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Canditech 52 · Eightfold AI 60
1.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Canditech 53 · Eightfold AI 60
0.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Canditech 58 · Eightfold AI 60
0.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -25.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Canditech minus Eightfold AI.
| Category | Weight | Canditech | Eightfold AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 37 | 75 | -38 | -7.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 85 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 53 | 60 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 50 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 64 (D) | -25 | -25.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Canditech | Eightfold AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain, and 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Canditech last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next