The result

Cappfinity and Feenyx tie at 40.

Cappfinity and Feenyx, both in the Assessment cohort, tie at 40 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Cappfinity leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Feenyx 2, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cappfinity 36, Feenyx 42 — and at a 20% weight it carries 63% of the weighted advantage Feenyx holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Cappfinity4
  • Feenyx2
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Article 11 Technical Documentation36 vs 42
Heaviest weighted swing
Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Cappfinity and Feenyx are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.

RecordCappfinityFeenyx
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20052016

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight36% of the movement so far

    Cappfinity36
    Feenyx42

    1.2 weighted points to Feenyx

  2. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight58% of the movement so far

    Cappfinity52
    Feenyx58

    0.7 weighted points to Feenyx

  3. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight75% of the movement so far

    Cappfinity28
    Feenyx25

    0.5 weighted points to Cappfinity

  4. FRIA Support

    15% weight88% of the movement so far

    Cappfinity28
    Feenyx25

    0.4 weighted points to Cappfinity

  5. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight98% of the movement so far

    Cappfinity52
    Feenyx50

    0.3 weighted points to Cappfinity

  6. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Cappfinity56
    Feenyx55

    0.1 weighted points to Cappfinity

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.6.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cappfinity minus Feenyx, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightCappfinityFeenyxΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3642-6-1.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2825+3+0.5
FRIA Support15%2825+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5250+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5258-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3838--
Customer Documentation8%5655+1+0.1
Total100%40F40F--0.6

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCappfinityFeenyx
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain80Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%297Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain305Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity and Feenyx sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 71 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Cappfinity last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Feenyx last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next