§ The result
Jobma leads Cappfinity on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Jobma, filed under Video interview, finishes on 49 and Cappfinity, filed under Assessment, on 40, 9 points apart. Jobma takes all 7 criteria from Cappfinity without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Data Governance Disclosure, Cappfinity 52 to Jobma 56. The advantage Jobma holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Cappfinity 36, Jobma 55, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 39% of the weighted points Jobma gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
§ The record
Cappfinity is filed under Assessment AI, Jobma under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Cappfinity | Jobma |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2005 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cappfinity 36 · Jobma 55
3.8 weighted points to Jobma
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cappfinity 28 · Jobma 40
2.2 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cappfinity 28 · Jobma 35
1.1 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cappfinity 52 · Jobma 60
1.0 weighted points to Jobma
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cappfinity 38 · Jobma 44
0.7 weighted points to Jobma
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cappfinity 52 · Jobma 56
0.6 weighted points to Jobma
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cappfinity 56 · Jobma 62
0.5 weighted points to Jobma
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cappfinity minus Jobma.
| Category | Weight | Cappfinity | Jobma | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 36 | 55 | -19 | -3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 56 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 44 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 62 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 49 (F) | -9 | -9.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cappfinity | Jobma | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 17 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobma last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next