Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Cappfinity vs Pillar
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Pillar
Pillar (now "AI Interview Companion by Employ") is an interview intelligence platform that records and transcribes job interviews, generates AI interview guides and highlight clips, and surfaces candidate insights and interviewer-coaching recommendations.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Cappfinity and Pillar tie at 40.
Cappfinity (Assessment) and Pillar (Screening) tie at 40 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Cappfinity leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Pillar 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Cappfinity 28, Pillar 38) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 55% of the weighted advantage Pillar holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Cappfinity4
- Pillar3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency28 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Cappfinity is filed under Assessment AI, Pillar under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Cappfinity | Pillar |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2005 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight30% of the movement so far
Cappfinity28Pillar381.8 weighted points to Pillar
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight51% of the movement so far
Cappfinity36Pillar421.2 weighted points to Pillar
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight69% of the movement so far
Cappfinity52Pillar451.1 weighted points to Cappfinity
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight79% of the movement so far
Cappfinity38Pillar330.6 weighted points to Cappfinity
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight87% of the movement so far
Cappfinity52Pillar480.5 weighted points to Cappfinity
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
Cappfinity56Pillar500.5 weighted points to Cappfinity
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Cappfinity28Pillar300.3 weighted points to Pillar
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cappfinity minus Pillar, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Cappfinity | Pillar | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 36 | 42 | -6 | -1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 48 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 33 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 50 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 40F | 40F | - | -0.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cappfinity | Pillar | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pillar has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 19 for Pillar, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pillar last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.