§ The result
Talview takes the total, Cappfinity takes more of the criteria.
Talview (Video interview) edges Cappfinity (Assessment) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 42 to 40. Cappfinity leads more of the criteria than Talview — 4 to 3 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which Talview leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Talview. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Cappfinity 36, Talview 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 56% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Cappfinity
Cappfinity sells strengths-, skills- and cognitive-reasoning assessments, task-based job simulations, a digital assessment centre and an asynchronous video interview platform with optional AI-assisted scoring, and is used mainly for graduate and early-careers hiring.
Vendor profile
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
§ The record
Cappfinity is filed under Assessment AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Cappfinity | Talview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2005 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cappfinity 36 · Talview 50
2.8 weighted points to Talview
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cappfinity 28 · Talview 38
1.8 weighted points to Talview
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cappfinity 38 · Talview 32
0.7 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cappfinity 52 · Talview 48
0.6 weighted points to Cappfinity
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cappfinity 28 · Talview 25
0.4 weighted points to Cappfinity
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cappfinity 52 · Talview 55
0.4 weighted points to Talview
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cappfinity 56 · Talview 52
0.3 weighted points to Cappfinity
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cappfinity minus Talview.
| Category | Weight | Cappfinity | Talview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 36 | 50 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 48 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 32 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 52 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 42 (F) | -2 | -2.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cappfinity | Talview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cappfinity has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cappfinity sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for Cappfinity, across 6 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cappfinity last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next