Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Ceipal vs HireQuotient
Ceipal
AI-powered applicant tracking and workforce-management platform for staffing firms that sources, matches, and ranks candidates on a 1-to-100 scale against job requirements.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
1 point separates Ceipal and HireQuotient.
Ceipal (ATS-integrated) edges HireQuotient (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 35 to 34. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Ceipal: Ceipal is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and HireQuotient on Human Oversight Design. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Human Oversight Design, and HireQuotient holds it (Ceipal 46, HireQuotient 57, 12% weight), worth 57% of the weighted advantage HireQuotient builds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Ceipal5
- HireQuotient2
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design46 vs 57
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Ceipal is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HireQuotient is in scope of
| Record | Ceipal | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight25% of the movement so far
Ceipal46HireQuotient571.3 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight44% of the movement so far
Ceipal30HireQuotient351.0 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight63% of the movement so far
Ceipal38HireQuotient301.0 weighted points to Ceipal
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight80% of the movement so far
Ceipal46HireQuotient400.9 weighted points to Ceipal
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight89% of the movement so far
Ceipal25HireQuotient220.4 weighted points to Ceipal
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight95% of the movement so far
Ceipal20HireQuotient180.4 weighted points to Ceipal
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Ceipal53HireQuotient500.2 weighted points to Ceipal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Ceipal minus HireQuotient, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Ceipal | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 18 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 46 | 40 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 46 | 57 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 53 | 50 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 35F | 34F | +1 | +0.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Ceipal | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Ceipal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.