The result

Keka leads Ceipal on 5 of the 7 criteria.

Within the ATS-integrated cohort, Keka edges Ceipal by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 37 to 35. Ceipal is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Keka takes 5, the remaining 2 are level, and the nearest of those 5 is Post-Market Monitoring, Ceipal 38 to Keka 40. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Ceipal 25, Keka 30, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Keka holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Ceipal0
  • Keka5
  • Level2
Widest raw gap
FRIA Support25 vs 30
Heaviest weighted swing
FRIA Support15% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Ceipal and Keka are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

RecordCeipalKeka
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded20152014

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. FRIA Support

    15% weight34% of the movement so far

    Ceipal25
    Keka30

    0.8 weighted points to Keka

  2. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight61% of the movement so far

    Ceipal46
    Keka50

    0.6 weighted points to Keka

  3. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight82% of the movement so far

    Ceipal46
    Keka50

    0.5 weighted points to Keka

  4. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight93% of the movement so far

    Ceipal38
    Keka40

    0.2 weighted points to Keka

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Ceipal53
    Keka55

    0.2 weighted points to Keka

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -2.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.2.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Ceipal minus Keka, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightCeipalKekaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2020--
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4650-4-0.6
Human Oversight Design12%4650-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5355-2-0.2
Total100%35F37F-2-2.2

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCeipalKeka
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%137Sources on the vendor's own domain287Sources on the vendor's own domain

Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Ceipal last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next