Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Ceipal vs Loxo
Ceipal
AI-powered applicant tracking and workforce-management platform for staffing firms that sources, matches, and ranks candidates on a 1-to-100 scale against job requirements.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Loxo
Loxo is an AI-native talent-intelligence platform that combines candidate sourcing, a recruiting CRM, and an applicant tracking system, using proprietary ranking models and a self-built talent graph of 800M+ people to source, rank, and match candidates for recruiting and staffing firms.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Loxo leads Ceipal on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Loxo holds a 2-point edge over Ceipal under rubric v1.0, 37 to 35, across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Ceipal is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Loxo takes 5, the remaining 2 are level, and the nearest of those 5 is Post-Market Monitoring, Ceipal 38 to Loxo 40. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Ceipal 25, Loxo 30, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage Loxo holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Ceipal0
- Loxo5
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support25 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Ceipal is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Loxo under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Ceipal | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight30% of the movement so far
Ceipal25Loxo300.8 weighted points to Loxo
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight55% of the movement so far
Ceipal46Loxo500.6 weighted points to Loxo
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight74% of the movement so far
Ceipal46Loxo500.5 weighted points to Loxo
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight90% of the movement so far
Ceipal53Loxo580.4 weighted points to Loxo
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Ceipal38Loxo400.2 weighted points to Loxo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -2.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Ceipal minus Loxo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Ceipal | Loxo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 20 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 46 | 50 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 46 | 50 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 53 | 58 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 35F | 37F | -2 | -2.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Ceipal | Loxo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Ceipal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Ceipal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Ceipal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Loxo last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.