Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment vs Radancy
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Radancy
Radancy is an enterprise talent acquisition cloud combining recruitment marketing, career sites and CRM with agentic AI that sources, screens, scores, ranks and schedules candidates, including one-way video screening inherited from its myInterview acquisition.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Cezanne Recruitment and Radancy tie at 41.
Cezanne Recruitment (ATS-integrated) and Radancy (Sourcing) tie at 41 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Cezanne Recruitment leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Radancy 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, is both the widest raw gap (Cezanne Recruitment 44, Radancy 36) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 53% of the weighted advantage Cezanne Recruitment holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Cezanne Recruitment3
- Radancy3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring44 vs 36
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Cezanne Recruitment is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Radancy under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Radancy is in scope of
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Radancy |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2006 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight32% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment44Radancy361.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight55% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment24Radancy200.7 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight75% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment54Radancy580.6 weighted points to Radancy
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight88% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment40Radancy420.4 weighted points to Radancy
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment57Radancy600.2 weighted points to Radancy
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Cezanne Recruitment58Radancy570.1 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Radancy, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Radancy | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 20 | +4 | +0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 57 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 36 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 41F | - | +0.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Radancy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Radancy has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for Radancy, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Radancy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.