Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Clevry vs HackerEarth
Clevry
Clevry is a UK psychometric assessment platform offering norm-referenced personality questionnaires, cognitive ability tests and situational judgement tests, plus recorded one-way video interviews, an interview builder, a skills-first ATS and an AI tool that maps job ads onto its personality scale library.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
HackerEarth takes the total, Clevry takes more of the criteria.
Within the Assessment cohort, HackerEarth edges Clevry by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 46 to 45. Clevry leads more of the criteria than HackerEarth — 4 to 3 — but Post-Market Monitoring, which HackerEarth leads, carries 12% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HackerEarth. One criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, is both the widest raw gap (Clevry 30, HackerEarth 42) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 62% of the weighted advantage HackerEarth holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Clevry4
- HackerEarth3
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring30 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Clevry and HackerEarth are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Clevry | HackerEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 1991 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight38% of the movement so far
Clevry30HackerEarth421.4 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight54% of the movement so far
Clevry52HackerEarth550.6 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight68% of the movement so far
Clevry38HackerEarth350.5 weighted points to Clevry
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight80% of the movement so far
Clevry55HackerEarth520.4 weighted points to Clevry
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight87% of the movement so far
Clevry30HackerEarth320.3 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Clevry58HackerEarth560.2 weighted points to Clevry
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Clevry60HackerEarth570.2 weighted points to Clevry
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Clevry minus HackerEarth, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Clevry | HackerEarth | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 32 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 56 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 57 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 46F | -1 | -0.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Clevry | HackerEarth | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 39 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 83 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Clevry last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.