§ The result
Clevry leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Clevry finishes 15 points clear of HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0 — 45 against 30 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Of the 7 criteria HeroHunt.ai wins none, and the narrowest lead Clevry holds is on Post-Market Monitoring, Clevry 30 to HeroHunt.ai 28. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Clevry 52, HeroHunt.ai 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage Clevry holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Clevry
Clevry is a UK psychometric assessment platform offering norm-referenced personality questionnaires, cognitive ability tests and situational judgement tests, plus recorded one-way video interviews, an interview builder, a skills-first ATS and an AI tool that maps job ads onto its personality scale library.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
§ The record
Clevry is filed under Assessment AI, HeroHunt.ai under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Clevry is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Clevry | HeroHunt.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | NL |
| Founded | 1991 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Clevry 52 · HeroHunt.ai 20
6.4 weighted points to Clevry
18% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Clevry 38 · HeroHunt.ai 10
5.0 weighted points to Clevry
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Clevry 55 · HeroHunt.ai 45
1.5 weighted points to Clevry
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Clevry 60 · HeroHunt.ai 48
1.0 weighted points to Clevry
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Clevry 30 · HeroHunt.ai 27
0.4 weighted points to Clevry
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Clevry 58 · HeroHunt.ai 55
0.4 weighted points to Clevry
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Clevry 30 · HeroHunt.ai 28
0.2 weighted points to Clevry
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +14.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +14.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Clevry minus HeroHunt.ai.
| Category | Weight | Clevry | HeroHunt.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 20 | +32 | +6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 10 | +28 | +5.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 27 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 30 (F) | +15 | +14.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Clevry | HeroHunt.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 39 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Clevry has 44 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 39 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Clevry and HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 76 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 44 for Clevry, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Clevry last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next