§ The result
Coderbyte leads Entelo on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Coderbyte, filed under Assessment, finishes on 42 and Entelo, filed under Sourcing, on 33, 9 points apart. Entelo is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Coderbyte takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Post-Market Monitoring, Coderbyte 40 to Entelo 35. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (Coderbyte 60, Entelo 42) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Coderbyte 44, Entelo 30), the second being 28% of the weighted advantage Coderbyte holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
§ The record
Coderbyte is filed under Assessment AI, Entelo under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Coderbyte is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Coderbyte | Entelo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Coderbyte 44 · Entelo 30
2.8 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Coderbyte 60 · Entelo 42
2.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Coderbyte 56 · Entelo 45
1.6 weighted points to Coderbyte
8% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Coderbyte 58 · Entelo 40
1.4 weighted points to Coderbyte
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Coderbyte 33 · Entelo 25
1.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Coderbyte 40 · Entelo 35
0.6 weighted points to Coderbyte
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +9.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Coderbyte minus Entelo.
| Category | Weight | Coderbyte | Entelo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 44 | 30 | +14 | +2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 20 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 25 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 45 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 33 (F) | +9 | +9.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Coderbyte | Entelo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next