Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Coderbyte vs Humanly
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Coderbyte and Humanly tie at 42.
Coderbyte (Assessment) and Humanly (Screening) tie at 42 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Coderbyte leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Humanly 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Coderbyte 20, Humanly 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 88% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Coderbyte4
- Humanly3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Coderbyte is filed under Assessment AI, Humanly under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Coderbyte | Humanly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight43% of the movement so far
Coderbyte20Humanly403.6 weighted points to Humanly
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight71% of the movement so far
Coderbyte56Humanly402.4 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Coderbyte40Humanly301.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight91% of the movement so far
Coderbyte58Humanly520.5 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
Coderbyte33Humanly350.3 weighted points to Humanly
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Coderbyte60Humanly580.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 7
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight100% of the movement so far
Coderbyte44Humanly450.2 weighted points to Humanly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Coderbyte minus Humanly, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Coderbyte | Humanly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 44 | 45 | -1 | -0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 40 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 40 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 42F | 42F | - | +0.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Coderbyte | Humanly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.