§ The result
Coderbyte leads myInterview by 5 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Coderbyte, filed under Assessment, finishes on 42 and myInterview, filed under Video interview, on 37, 5 points apart. Coderbyte leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while myInterview leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — myInterview takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, Coderbyte 20 to myInterview 35, 100% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, Coderbyte 58 to myInterview 40.
Vendor profile
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
Coderbyte is filed under Assessment AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Coderbyte | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Coderbyte 20 · myInterview 35
2.7 weighted points to myInterview
15% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Coderbyte 56 · myInterview 42
2.1 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Coderbyte 60 · myInterview 48
1.4 weighted points to Coderbyte
8% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Coderbyte 58 · myInterview 40
1.4 weighted points to Coderbyte
20% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Coderbyte 44 · myInterview 38
1.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Coderbyte 33 · myInterview 25
1.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Coderbyte 40 · myInterview 33
0.8 weighted points to Coderbyte
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Coderbyte minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | Coderbyte | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 44 | 38 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 35 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 25 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 42 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 37 (F) | +5 | +5.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Coderbyte | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next