Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Coderbyte vs Tengai
Coderbyte
Coderbyte is a technical hiring platform offering coding assessments with automated and AI grading of challenges and take-home projects, live coding interviews, and AI screening that grades resumes against job-description criteria and runs agentic phone screens.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Tengai
Tengai runs structured screening interviews through a browser-based AI avatar and combines candidates' yes/no qualification answers, a Five-Factor-based personality score and recruiter ratings of open answers into an automatically ranked shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Coderbyte and Tengai tie at 42.
Coderbyte (Assessment) and Tengai (Screening) tie at 42 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Coderbyte leads 5 of the 7 criteria and Tengai 2, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Coderbyte 20, Tengai 33) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 92% of the weighted advantage Tengai holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Coderbyte5
- Tengai2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 33
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Coderbyte is filed under Assessment AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Coderbyte | Tengai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight42% of the movement so far
Coderbyte20Tengai332.3 weighted points to Tengai
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight59% of the movement so far
Coderbyte56Tengai500.9 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight74% of the movement so far
Coderbyte40Tengai330.8 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
Coderbyte33Tengai280.8 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Coderbyte60Tengai580.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
Coderbyte58Tengai550.2 weighted points to Coderbyte
- 7
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight100% of the movement so far
Coderbyte44Tengai450.2 weighted points to Tengai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Coderbyte minus Tengai, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Coderbyte | Tengai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 44 | 45 | -1 | -0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 33 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 28 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 50 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 42F | 42F | - | +0.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Coderbyte | Tengai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 37 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Coderbyte has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Coderbyte and Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 73 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Coderbyte, across 2 distinct source domains, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Coderbyte last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tengai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.