Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Codility vs Criteria
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Criteria
Criteria is a pre-employment assessment platform offering scientifically validated cognitive aptitude, personality, emotional-intelligence and skills tests, plus structured and AI-assisted interview tools, used to evaluate and rank job candidates.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Codility and Criteria.
Within the Assessment cohort, Codility edges Criteria by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 54 to 53. Criteria takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 4 for Codility, whose share includes FRIA Support. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — Criteria takes Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20%, Codility 60 to Criteria 68, 55% of the weighted advantage Criteria holds — while the widest raw gap sits on FRIA Support, Codility 42 to Criteria 32.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Codility4
- Criteria3
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support42 vs 32
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Codility and Criteria are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Codility | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2009 | 2006 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight24% of the movement so far
Codility60Criteria681.6 weighted points to Criteria
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight47% of the movement so far
Codility42Criteria321.5 weighted points to Codility
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight62% of the movement so far
Codility50Criteria421.0 weighted points to Codility
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight73% of the movement so far
Codility57Criteria620.8 weighted points to Criteria
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight84% of the movement so far
Codility62Criteria560.7 weighted points to Codility
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight93% of the movement so far
Codility45Criteria480.5 weighted points to Criteria
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Codility66Criteria600.5 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus Criteria, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Codility | Criteria | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 68 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 48 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 32 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 56 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 42 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 60 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 54F | 53F | +1 | +0.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | Criteria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Criteria has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Criteria, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Criteria last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against