§ The result
Codility leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
Codility finishes 21 points clear of Entelo under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 33 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Entelo leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Codility 60, Entelo 30, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 28% of the weighted advantage Codility holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
§ The record
Codility is filed under Assessment AI, Entelo under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Codility is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Codility | Entelo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Codility 60 · Entelo 30
6.0 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Codility 45 · Entelo 20
4.5 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 62% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Codility 42 · Entelo 25
2.5 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Codility 62 · Entelo 42
2.4 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Codility 66 · Entelo 40
2.1 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Codility 57 · Entelo 45
1.8 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Codility 50 · Entelo 35
1.8 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +21.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +21 beside that +21.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus Entelo.
| Category | Weight | Codility | Entelo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 30 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 20 | +25 | +4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 42 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 35 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 40 | +26 | +2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 33 (F) | +21 | +21.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | Entelo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next