§ The result
Codility leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Codility finishes 24 points clear of HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 30 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; HeroHunt.ai leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Codility 60, HeroHunt.ai 20, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Codility holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
§ The record
Codility is filed under Assessment AI, HeroHunt.ai under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Codility is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Codility | HeroHunt.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | NL |
| Founded | 2009 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Codility 60 · HeroHunt.ai 20
8.0 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Codility 45 · HeroHunt.ai 10
6.3 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Codility 50 · HeroHunt.ai 28
2.6 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Codility 42 · HeroHunt.ai 27
2.3 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Codility 57 · HeroHunt.ai 45
1.8 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Codility 66 · HeroHunt.ai 48
1.4 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Codility 62 · HeroHunt.ai 55
0.8 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +23.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +23.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus HeroHunt.ai.
| Category | Weight | Codility | HeroHunt.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 20 | +40 | +8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 10 | +35 | +6.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 27 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 28 | +22 | +2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 48 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 30 (F) | +24 | +23.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | HeroHunt.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next