§ The result
Codility leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Codility finishes 20 points clear of HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 34 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; HireLogic leads none. The advantage Codility holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Codility 45, HireLogic 15, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 28% of the weighted points Codility gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
§ The record
Codility is filed under Assessment AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Codility | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2009 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Codility 45 · HireLogic 15
5.4 weighted points to Codility
20% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Codility 60 · HireLogic 42
3.6 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Codility 50 · HireLogic 28
2.6 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Codility 42 · HireLogic 25
2.5 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Codility 57 · HireLogic 45
1.8 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Codility 62 · HireLogic 48
1.7 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Codility 66 · HireLogic 45
1.7 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +19.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +19.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus HireLogic.
| Category | Weight | Codility | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 15 | +30 | +5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 28 | +22 | +2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 45 | +21 | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 34 (F) | +20 | +19.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next