§ The result
Codility leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Codility finishes 23 points clear of Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 31 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Intervue.io leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (Codility 45, Intervue.io 12) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Codility 60, Intervue.io 28), 28% of the weighted advantage Codility builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Codility is filed under Assessment AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Codility | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | IN |
| Founded | 2009 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Codility 60 · Intervue.io 28
6.4 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Codility 45 · Intervue.io 12
5.9 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Codility 42 · Intervue.io 22
3.0 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Codility 57 · Intervue.io 38
2.9 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Codility 50 · Intervue.io 30
2.4 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Codility 66 · Intervue.io 50
1.3 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Codility 62 · Intervue.io 54
1.0 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +22.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +23 beside that +22.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Codility | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 28 | +32 | +6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 12 | +33 | +5.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 22 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 38 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 54 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 30 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 50 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 31 (F) | +23 | +22.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next