§ The result
Codility leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Codility finishes 17 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 37 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Codility leads every one of the 7 criteria, myInterview none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Codility 45 to myInterview 35. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Codility 66, myInterview 40) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Codility 60, myInterview 38), the second being 26% of the weighted advantage Codility holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
Codility is filed under Assessment AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Codility | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | AU |
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Codility 60 · myInterview 38
4.4 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 41% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Codility 42 · myInterview 25
2.5 weighted points to Codility
15% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Codility 57 · myInterview 42
2.3 weighted points to Codility
8% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Codility 66 · myInterview 40
2.1 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Codility 50 · myInterview 33
2.0 weighted points to Codility
18% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Codility 45 · myInterview 35
1.8 weighted points to Codility
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Codility 62 · myInterview 48
1.7 weighted points to Codility
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Codility minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | Codility | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 35 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 42 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 33 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 40 | +26 | +2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 37 (F) | +17 | +16.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Codility | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Codility has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Codility, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Codility last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next