Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Eightfold AI vs Greenhouse
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Concerning
Sourcing
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
The result
3 points separate Greenhouse and Eightfold AI.
Greenhouse holds a 3-point edge over Eightfold AI under rubric v1.0, 67 to 64, across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Eightfold AI takes 1 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 6 for Greenhouse, whose share includes Post-Market Monitoring. The advantage Greenhouse holds is spread out: Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Eightfold AI 50, Greenhouse 58, 12% weight), yet it supplies only 28% of the weighted points Greenhouse gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Eightfold AI1
- Greenhouse6
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring50 vs 58
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Eightfold AI is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Greenhouse is in scope of
| Record | Eightfold AI | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight25% of the movement so far
Eightfold AI50Greenhouse581.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight44% of the movement so far
Eightfold AI60Greenhouse660.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight60% of the movement so far
Eightfold AI75Greenhouse780.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight75% of the movement so far
Eightfold AI60Greenhouse640.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight87% of the movement so far
Eightfold AI45Greenhouse420.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
Eightfold AI60Greenhouse640.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight100% of the movement so far
Eightfold AI85Greenhouse860.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Eightfold AI minus Greenhouse, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Eightfold AI | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 75 | 78 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 86 | -1 | -0.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 45 | 42 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 64D | 67D | -3 | -2.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Eightfold AI | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.