§ The result
Eightfold AI leads Talview on all 7 criteria.
Eightfold AI finishes 22 points clear of Talview under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 42 (F) — across the Sourcing and Video interview cohorts. Eightfold AI leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Talview leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Eightfold AI 85, Talview 38, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Vendor profile
Talview
AI-powered hiring and exam-integrity platform spanning video interviewing, skills assessments, identity verification, and AI proctoring.
§ The record
Eightfold AI is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Talview is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Eightfold AI | Talview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Eightfold AI 85 · Talview 38
8.5 weighted points to Eightfold AI
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Eightfold AI 75 · Talview 50
5.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Eightfold AI 45 · Talview 25
3.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Eightfold AI 50 · Talview 32
2.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Eightfold AI 60 · Talview 48
1.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Eightfold AI 60 · Talview 52
0.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Eightfold AI 60 · Talview 55
0.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +21.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +21.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Eightfold AI minus Talview.
| Category | Weight | Eightfold AI | Talview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 75 | 50 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 38 | +47 | +8.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 45 | 25 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 32 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 42 (F) | +22 | +21.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Eightfold AI | Talview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next