Side-by-side · Rubric js-v1.0
Enhancv vs Teal
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Concerning
Resume AI
Teal
Teal is a freemium platform for job seekers offering an AI resume builder, a job-application tracker/CRM, and resume-to-job-description keyword matching, plus a Chrome extension that saves postings from 40+ job boards; it does not auto-apply, so the user manually submits every application.
Concerning
Tracker
The result
3 points separate Enhancv and Teal.
Enhancv (Resume AI) edges Teal (Tracker) by 3 points under rubric js-v1.0, 68 to 65. Enhancv leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while Teal leads 2, including Data & Credential Safety. Employer & ATS Legitimacy is the widest raw gap (Enhancv 78, Teal 68) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Application Honesty at 20% (Enhancv 68, Teal 60), 35% of the weighted advantage Enhancv builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Enhancv5
- Teal2
- Widest raw gap
- Employer & ATS Legitimacy78 vs 68
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Application Honesty20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Enhancv is filed under Resume & profile AI, Teal under Application trackers. They also share 1 secondary category: Job matching.
| Record | Enhancv | Teal |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | BG | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Application Honesty
20% weight25% of the movement so far
Enhancv68Teal601.6 weighted points to Enhancv
- 2
Data & Credential Safety
20% weight49% of the movement so far
Enhancv60Teal681.6 weighted points to Teal
- 3
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
15% weight72% of the movement so far
Enhancv78Teal681.5 weighted points to Enhancv
- 4
Effectiveness Evidence
12% weight87% of the movement so far
Enhancv52Teal441.0 weighted points to Enhancv
- 5
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
10% weight93% of the movement so far
Enhancv62Teal660.4 weighted points to Teal
- 6
User Control & Transparency
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Enhancv80Teal780.3 weighted points to Enhancv
- 7
Support & Accountability
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Enhancv72Teal700.2 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +2.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus Teal, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | Teal | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 60 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 68 | -8 | -1.6 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 78 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 68 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 44 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.4 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 70 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 68D | 65D | +3 | +2.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | Teal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Teal has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for Teal, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
The full profiles
Scored against