§ The result
3 points separate Enhancv and Teal.
Enhancv (Resume AI) edges Teal (Tracker) by 3 points under rubric js-v1.0, 68 to 65. Enhancv leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while Teal leads 2, including Data & Credential Safety. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Employer & ATS Legitimacy (Enhancv 78, Teal 68) and Application Honesty at 20% (Enhancv 68, Teal 60), the second being 35% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
Teal
Teal is a freemium platform for job seekers offering an AI resume builder, a job-application tracker/CRM, and resume-to-job-description keyword matching, plus a Chrome extension that saves postings from 40+ job boards; it does not auto-apply, so the user manually submits every application.
§ The record
Enhancv is filed under Resume & profile AI, Teal under Application trackers. They also share 1 secondary category: Job matching.
| Record | Enhancv | Teal |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | BG | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Enhancv 68 · Teal 60
1.6 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · Teal 68
1.6 weighted points to Teal
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · Teal 68
1.5 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · Teal 44
1.0 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Enhancv 62 · Teal 66
0.4 weighted points to Teal
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · Teal 78
0.3 weighted points to Enhancv
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Enhancv 72 · Teal 70
0.2 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +2.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus Teal.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | Teal | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 60 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 68 | -8 | -1.6 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 78 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 68 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 44 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.4 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 70 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 65 (D) | +3 | +2.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | Teal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | — |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Teal has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for Teal, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Teal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against