HomeCompareEntelo vs myInterview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs myInterview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

4 points separate myInterview and Entelo.

myInterview (Video interview) edges Entelo (Sourcing) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 37 to 33. myInterview leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Entelo leads 2, including Data Governance Disclosure, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Entelo 20, myInterview 35 — and at an 18% weight it carries 54% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEntelomyInterview
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded20112014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Entelo 20 · myInterview 35

    2.7 weighted points to myInterview

  2. 20% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Entelo 30 · myInterview 38

    1.6 weighted points to myInterview

  3. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Entelo 42 · myInterview 48

    0.7 weighted points to myInterview

  4. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · myInterview 42

    0.4 weighted points to Entelo

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Entelo 35 · myInterview 33

    0.2 weighted points to Entelo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -4.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus myInterview.

CategoryWeightEntelomyInterviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3038-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2035-15-2.7
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4542+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%4248-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3533+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%4040--
Total100%33 (F)37 (F)-4-4.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEntelomyInterview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%1111
Bias Audit Transparency18%2211
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%1111
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain76Sources on a separate domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
myInterview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.