The result

Feenyx and ZipRecruiter tie at 40.

Feenyx (Assessment) and ZipRecruiter (Sourcing) tie at 40 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Feenyx leads 4 of the 7 criteria and ZipRecruiter 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap (Feenyx 58, ZipRecruiter 55) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Feenyx 42, ZipRecruiter 40), 39% of the weighted advantage Feenyx builds across the 4 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Feenyx4
  • ZipRecruiter3
Widest raw gap
Human Oversight Design58 vs 55
Heaviest weighted swing
Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Feenyx is filed under Assessment AI, ZipRecruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordFeenyxZipRecruiter
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20162010

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight22% of the movement so far

    Feenyx42
    ZipRecruiter40

    0.4 weighted points to Feenyx

  2. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight41% of the movement so far

    Feenyx58
    ZipRecruiter55

    0.4 weighted points to Feenyx

  3. FRIA Support

    15% weight57% of the movement so far

    Feenyx25
    ZipRecruiter27

    0.3 weighted points to ZipRecruiter

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight73% of the movement so far

    Feenyx50
    ZipRecruiter52

    0.3 weighted points to ZipRecruiter

  5. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight86% of the movement so far

    Feenyx38
    ZipRecruiter40

    0.2 weighted points to ZipRecruiter

  6. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight96% of the movement so far

    Feenyx25
    ZipRecruiter24

    0.2 weighted points to Feenyx

  7. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Feenyx55
    ZipRecruiter54

    0.1 weighted points to Feenyx

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 1.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.2.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Feenyx minus ZipRecruiter, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightFeenyxZipRecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4240+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2524+1+0.2
FRIA Support15%2527-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5052-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5855+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5554+1+0.1
Total100%40F40F-+0.2

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFeenyxZipRecruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%80Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain40Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%305Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain285Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; ZipRecruiter has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Feenyx and ZipRecruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for ZipRecruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Feenyx last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
ZipRecruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next