Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Fetcher vs micro1
Fetcher
AI-powered candidate sourcing and outbound recruiting platform that automates passive and active talent sourcing, personalized email outreach, and inbound applicant screening for corporate recruiting teams.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
micro1
Zara, micro1's LLM-based AI interviewer, runs recorded, adaptive spoken interviews (with optional coding exercises and automated proctoring) and returns per-skill proficiency ratings, soft-skill ratings and a proctoring score; micro1 uses it to certify experts for its own AI-training talent network, and employers can use it through a client portal and API.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
1 point separates Fetcher and micro1.
Fetcher holds a 1-point edge over micro1 under rubric v1.0, 37 to 36, across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Fetcher leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while micro1 leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Article 11 Technical Documentation is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to micro1 — Fetcher 27, micro1 50, on a 20% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage micro1 holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Fetcher6
- micro11
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation27 vs 50
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Fetcher is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, micro1 under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only micro1 is in scope of
| Record | Fetcher | micro1 |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight44% of the movement so far
Fetcher27micro1504.6 weighted points to micro1
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight58% of the movement so far
Fetcher55micro1451.5 weighted points to Fetcher
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight72% of the movement so far
Fetcher28micro1201.4 weighted points to Fetcher
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight83% of the movement so far
Fetcher35micro1251.2 weighted points to Fetcher
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight91% of the movement so far
Fetcher55micro1450.8 weighted points to Fetcher
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Fetcher52micro1480.5 weighted points to Fetcher
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Fetcher25micro1220.4 weighted points to Fetcher
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fetcher minus micro1, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Fetcher | micro1 | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 27 | 50 | -23 | -4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 20 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 48 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 37F | 36F | +1 | +1.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Fetcher | micro1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Fetcher has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for micro1 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Fetcher, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Fetcher last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- micro1 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.