§ The result
3 points separate HiPeople and Fuel50.
HiPeople (Assessment) edges Fuel50 (Sourcing) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) to 58 (F). The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of HiPeople: HiPeople is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Fuel50 on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency, at 18%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to HiPeople (Fuel50 68, HiPeople 84), 47% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Post-Market Monitoring, Fuel50 40 to HiPeople 60.
Vendor profile
Fuel50
Fuel50 is an AI internal talent marketplace and workforce-transformation platform that matches employees to internal roles, gigs, mentors, learning and career paths, and fit-scores and ranks internal candidates for open roles and succession pipelines, using a skills ontology curated by in-house I/O psychologists.
Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
§ The record
Fuel50 is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HiPeople under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Fuel50 | HiPeople |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Fuel50 68 · HiPeople 84
2.9 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Fuel50 40 · HiPeople 60
2.4 weighted points to HiPeople
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Fuel50 70 · HiPeople 62
1.6 weighted points to Fuel50
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Fuel50 64 · HiPeople 58
0.9 weighted points to Fuel50
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Fuel50 32 · HiPeople 35
0.4 weighted points to HiPeople
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Fuel50 62 · HiPeople 66
0.3 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Fuel50 61 · HiPeople 62
0.1 weighted points to HiPeople
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fuel50 minus HiPeople.
| Category | Weight | Fuel50 | HiPeople | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 62 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 84 | -16 | -2.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 58 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 61 | 62 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 61 (D) | -3 | -3.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Fuel50 | HiPeople | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Fuel50 has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HiPeople has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Fuel50 and HiPeople sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Fuel50, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for HiPeople, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Fuel50 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiPeople last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next