Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Glider AI vs myInterview
Glider AI
Glider AI is a skills-validation platform that screens and verifies candidates with auto-scored skills assessments and coding simulations, autonomous AI video and voice interviews that score responses against job requirements, live coding interviews, AI proctoring, and biometric ID verification.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Glider AI leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Glider AI finishes 15 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 37 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Of the 7 criteria myInterview wins none, and the narrowest lead Glider AI holds is on Human Oversight Design, Glider AI 55 to myInterview 48. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Glider AI 68, myInterview 35, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Glider AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Glider AI7
- myInterview0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency68 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Glider AI | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight39% of the movement so far
Glider AI68myInterview355.9 weighted points to Glider AI
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight57% of the movement so far
Glider AI52myInterview382.8 weighted points to Glider AI
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight69% of the movement so far
Glider AI54myInterview421.8 weighted points to Glider AI
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight79% of the movement so far
Glider AI60myInterview401.6 weighted points to Glider AI
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight89% of the movement so far
Glider AI35myInterview251.5 weighted points to Glider AI
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight95% of the movement so far
Glider AI55myInterview480.8 weighted points to Glider AI
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Glider AI40myInterview330.8 weighted points to Glider AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +15.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Glider AI minus myInterview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Glider AI | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 38 | +14 | +2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 35 | +33 | +5.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 42 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 52F | 37F | +15 | +15.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Glider AI | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Glider AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.