Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Hogan Assessments
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Hogan Assessments
Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Gloat and Hogan Assessments tie at 47.
Gloat, filed under Sourcing, and Hogan Assessments, filed under Assessment, tie at 47 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Gloat leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Hogan Assessments 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Hogan Assessments takes the heaviest weighted swing, FRIA Support at 15% (Gloat 28, Hogan Assessments 36), which is 45% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Human Oversight Design, Gloat 62 to Hogan Assessments 52.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat3
- Hogan Assessments3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design62 vs 52
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Hogan Assessments under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Hogan Assessments |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 1987 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight24% of the movement so far
Gloat28Hogan Assessments361.2 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight48% of the movement so far
Gloat62Hogan Assessments521.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight69% of the movement so far
Gloat38Hogan Assessments441.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight87% of the movement so far
Gloat58Hogan Assessments520.9 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat48Hogan Assessments500.4 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat42Hogan Assessments400.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Hogan Assessments, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Hogan Assessments | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 44 | -6 | -1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 36 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 47F | - | -0.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Hogan Assessments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Hogan Assessments last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.