§ The result
hackajob leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, hackajob (Sourcing) opens a 16-point lead on JobDiva (ATS-integrated), 45 to 29. hackajob takes all 7 criteria and JobDiva none of them; the nearest contest is Bias Audit Transparency, hackajob 20 to JobDiva 15. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hackajob 60, JobDiva 28 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage hackajob holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only hackajob is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | hackajob | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
hackajob 60 · JobDiva 28
6.4 weighted points to hackajob
15% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
hackajob 58 · JobDiva 38
3.0 weighted points to hackajob
12% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
hackajob 55 · JobDiva 40
1.8 weighted points to hackajob
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
hackajob 32 · JobDiva 22
1.5 weighted points to hackajob
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
hackajob 60 · JobDiva 42
1.4 weighted points to hackajob
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
hackajob 38 · JobDiva 30
1.0 weighted points to hackajob
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
hackajob 20 · JobDiva 15
0.9 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +16.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 28 | +32 | +6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 15 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 22 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 38 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 29 (F) | +16 | +16.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next